Rigorous Methodology. Practical Outcomes.
Structured input, transparent analysis and practitioner interpretation.
A Structured Framework Built for Clarity
The Core Diagnostic covers the four foundational domains. Complete+ extends into three specialised areas reshaping modern treasury.
| Assessment domain | Core | Complete+ |
|---|---|---|
| Liquidity & Cash Management20 questions | Included | Included |
| Payments & Banking20 questions | Included | Included |
| Working Capital Management20 questions | Included | Included |
| Risk & Compliance20 questions | Included | Included |
| Digital Assets & Innovation11 questions | —Not included | Included |
| AI & Fraud Prevention8 questions | —Not included | Included |
| Payment Ecosystem Strategy8 questions | —Not included | Included |
| Maturity questions | 80 | 107 |
The same maturity framework applies to both scopes. Core assesses four domains; Complete+ adds three. Financial and company-profile inputs are additional to the maturity questions.
How maturity is scored — five levels+
- L1 · Initial — ad hoc, manual, high-risk
- L2 · Developing — basic processes in place, limited visibility
- L3 · Defined — consistent processes, some automation
- L4 · Managed — integrated systems, proactive management
- L5 · Optimised — strategic function, continuous improvement
What maturity looks like
Each domain is scored on the five-level scale. The radar shows the four Core domains of the illustrative sample report — the same structure your report uses.
Transparent Calculation Methodology
Client inputs and reference assumptions support estimated financial opportunities where the evidence permits.
01
Structured Input
Treasury responses and available financial inputs.
02
Maturity Assessment
Rule-based scoring across the selected domains.
03
Financial Analysis
Estimated opportunities, assumptions and scenario ranges.
04
Prioritised Roadmap
Management Considerations sequenced for decision-making.
Illustrative GTD report examples — not actual client results.
Scenarios, confidence and reference benchmarks
Conservative, Base and Optimistic scenarios show how estimates change with the model’s assumptions. Confidence indicators distinguish supplied data from reference assumptions; they are not statistical guarantees.
Structured maturity reference standards and applicable benchmark information, including published research, derived reference data and GTD expert calibration. These are reference comparisons, not evidence of a live proprietary client cohort.
Technology handles the processing — not the judgment. Every report is reviewed by an experienced treasury professional before delivery. Read more about what you receive.
Not a Benchmark Report. A Roadmap.
The deliverable is structured to support immediate prioritisation and longer-term planning — combining near-term initiatives with a phased transformation pathway:
- Prioritised initiatives for the first 90 days, each supported by transparent value calculations
- A 24-month transformation roadmap structured around phased milestones and decision points
- Three strategic pillars — Operational Excellence, Strategic Control, and Intelligent Treasury — with clear ownership
- Value realisation logic showing how individual opportunities contribute to total annual impact
- Comparison with applicable benchmark reference values
Designed for board-level discussion — and for the treasury team responsible for execution.
Foundation
Months 1–6
Enhancement
Months 7–12
Optimisation
Months 13–18
Best-in-Class
Months 19–24
Ready to begin?
Core includes 80 maturity questions; Complete+ includes 107. Scope and delivery arrangements are confirmed before you begin.
Request Access